Michael Kerrisk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Li Zefan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Michael Kerrisk wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Andrew Vagin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> we have many messages about this bug in mail lists. >>>> Let's add proper comment in code. >>> Hi Andrew, >>> >>> Can you say more about what the bug is? Pointers to discussions, etc. >>> I ask because it may be worth adding something to the manual page >>> about the bug. >>> >> It's already in the BUG section in man page, and it's you who added it. :) > > Oh, so it's this bug >
exactly. ;) > Before kernel 2.6.25, a kernel bug > meant that the kernel code that was > intended to coalesce successive identical > events (i.e., the two most recent > events could potentially be coalesced > if the older had not yet been read) > instead checked if the most recent event > could be coalesced with the oldest > unread event. > > ? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
