Hi,

  I am working on Crackerjack project.
Both in Portland and in OLS seem to be difficult, I think.
I prefer Plumbers, because as Greg said developers from
libc to kernel would join this meeting, and other test project
would join Plumbers..
LTP has a lot of layers of test cases, I think Plumbers
would provide good opportunity to talk with them.


I am also starting to have Test summit in this October in Japan.
Because Kernel Summit followed by 3 days Conference will be
held in Japan, I think this is a good opportunity that test engineers, 
especially who are located in Asian area, can talk / discuss with Kernel 
Engineers.

So, my idea is 
having Test Summit in both Portland and Japan.

 What about this idea ?

Hashimoto Hisashi

>On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:08:02PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Friday 27 February 2009 22:11:07 Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:03:30PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > > On Friday 27 February 2009 21:05:32 Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>> > > > On 2/27/09, Subrata Modak <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > The Linux Test project has been in existence for many years, and, the
>> > > > > benefits of this Project has been well established. However, due to
>> > > > > several reasons the developers/stakeholders of this project has never
>> > > > > meet face to face. Hence, i would like to propose a Mini Summit for
>> > > > > LTP on the sidelines of the OLS 2009, scheduled to be held at
>> > > > > Montreal, Canada, July 13th-17th, 2009
>> > > > > (http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2009/).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The proposal for mini summit has been accepted in principle by the
>> > > > > OLS committee. Since, there are no specific summit/meet/conference
>> > > > > for LTP developers, this is a very good opportunity for LTP
>> > > > > developers to meet side-by-side the OLS, as many of them will be
>> > > > > coming to attend/present in the OLS. We can meet and discuss various
>> > > > > issues relating to LTP in the same meet, some of them being:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > i) Presentation/discussion by developers/testers/users on various
>> > > > > issues on test infrastructure/environment/test cases. Here we plan to
>> > > > > abreast ourselves with several of such issues, and, somebody can take
>> > > > > the responsibility for those line item(s),
>> > > > > ii) Presentation/discussion by developers/testers/users on what they
>> > > > > contributed to LTP, and, what they plan to do in near/far future,
>> > > > > iii) Presentation/discussion by Maintainer of the present situation
>> > > > > of LTP, and, what he might expect from the community to take this
>> > > > > forward, iv) Presentation/discussion by Maintainer on how to increase
>> > > > > LTP penetration in other areas (archs, etc) of Linux testing, like
>> > > > > the Z-linux, embedded hardware, etc,
>> > > > > v) How best to leverage on Project Collaboration like Crackerjack to
>> > > > > LTP porting of tests,
>> > > > > vi) Other proposals(if any) from the community is also to be
>> > > > > discussed.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I have discussed this with Andrew J Hutton of OLS committee. He has
>> > > > > agreed in principle to lend us a room/accessories to conduct the Mini
>> > > > > Summit, provided there are enough attendance of a minimum of 10
>> > > > > people.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > If all/some of you agree and feel that it would be great for all of
>> > > > > us to meet, and we have the enough nos. i can talk to Andrew to
>> > > > > confirm a berth for us.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Please feel free to propose new agenda and comment on the proposed
>> > > > > agenda.
>> > > >
>> > > > This is a little OT, but I wonder: might this not be better targeted
>> > > > at the Plumbers Conference in Portland?  It's very much an ecosystem
>> > > > topic, which I imagine would be a good fit (see
>> > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/319215/ ).  Assuming it was a fit, then there
>> > > > could actually be a microconf track devoted to the topic.  Since
>> > > > Plumbers is explicitly a developer oriented conference, and is
>> > > > doubling up with LinuxCon, it might be that more potential interested
>> > > > parties are at that conference than OLS.  (Speaking personally at
>> > > > least, if I manage to make it to just one of these, then Plumbers is
>> > > > probably the more likely of the two.)
>> > >
>> > > i'm not so sure ... i see LTP targeting more the low level libc/kernel
>> > > interface.  the plumbers sit on top of that and LTP doesnt really target
>> > > the plumbing layer ...
>> >
>> > Um, the "plumbers" include the libc / kernel developers, so I think that
>> > is a direct target audience :)
>> 
>> like i said, i'm *not* saying both cannot be done.  i just think the LS 
>> makes 
>> more sense if there's only going to be one.  but maybe i view plumbers as 
>> sitting higher up the stack than other people (and reality :p).  plus, 
>> Subrata 
>> is doing the hard work ... i'm the lazy one.
>
>My view is that Plumbers is neither higher nor lower in the stack than
>LS, but rather that Plumbers has a specific focus on things that involve
>multiple layers of the stack.  Testing of multiple layers of the stack
>seems to me to be pretty important, as a number of the bugs that have
>hidden the longest involve interactions between multiple layers.
>
>                                                       Thanx, Paul
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
>-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
>-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
>-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
>_______________________________________________
>Crackerjack-devel mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crackerjack-devel
>
Hisashi Hashimoto
Section Manager
Open Source Software Promotion Center
Platform Software
Hitachi, Ltd., Software Division
Tel : +81-45-862-8424, Fax : +81-45-862-9047
[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to