[...] >> So I'm not sure that Gabor's tests would be useful in LTP. > > Thanks for explaining the rationale in the test. With contribution(s) to > LTP being very less in terms of new tests, i think it is a good idea to > look through LKML, if developers are writing some unit test(s), and then > evaluate their worthiness to be made part of LTP. I would rather fall > back on you guys, who have regular interface to LKML to help me in > deciding that.
No problem! > Thanks very much. I would not pursue with this test > further. Glad to help. Cheers, Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
