Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com): > Would it be acceptable to instead insert a WARN message beforehand and > reference the caveat behind using mq in a previous kernel version, > like was done with inotify02 recently, so that way the test is run, > but the user is educated on the fact that the results could be a bit > misleading?
You mean do this only in the case of an older kernel version? If so, that seems fine... it's just that that is permanent code for a both unlikely and temporary case. So if I were an ltp maintainer I'd say no, bc I wouldn't want to maintain anything which was any more complicated than it needed to be. But I'm not, and from my pov both ways should properly report failures, so I'm fine with either way. -serge ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
