Kumar reported this.

Regards--
Subrata

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kumar Gala <[email protected]>wrote:

> I'm seeing some weird behavior in 2.6.30-rc1 that didn't exist in 2.6.29.
>  We have a slightly older LTP version (20080131) that we run on some
> embedded PPC boards.  If I run the syscall tests on 2.6.29 things pass as
> expected.  W/2.6.30-rc1 I start seeing a slew of processes that are
> "defunct".  I was able to trim down the tests to the following ones (the
> recv01 test will become defunct):
>
> ptrace01 ptrace01
> ptrace02 ptrace02
> ptrace03 ptrace03
>
> recv01 recv01
>
> I'm able to reproduce this in a simulator, and am working on bisecting it
> down now.
>
> Was wondering if there was anything ptrace related that went in that could
> possible cause this?
>
> - k
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>



-- 
Regards & Thanks--
Subrata
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to