Hi Subrata, I would like talk to you about times03.
I found this part of message at http://lwn.net/Articles/280726/ about times03 but times03 is still there. That message is from Thu, 01 May 2008 and from that time there are only changes which I did around coding style cleanup. 33) Log Message: According to Ulrich Drepper, times02 test is bogus (at least for archs which report return value and error in the same value) and times has no reserved error code. So following patch removes times02 from testsuite and moves times03 test to times02. For more information please see http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2008-04/msg00054.... <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2008-04/msg00054.html> and http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2008-04/msg00055.... <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2008-04/msg00055.html>. Signed-off-by: S.Ça?lar Onur <[email protected]> Currently times03 failed on my system with the following fault # ./times03 times03 1 FAIL : Error: times() report 0 child system time should be > than zero Any hints what could be wrong? Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng) PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
