Hi,

There is no problem with the genhtml.pl script. The real problem is in the
pan driver (ltp/pan/pan.c). This seems to be a problem of race condition
after going through the code.

My suggestion was to use the buffered mode as default. This can be done with
the -O option followed by a directory name where the buffered data can be
stored. But, there is a problem - the -O option has no effect unless the -x
option with an argument greater than 1 is used.

In your test runs you can add the options " -O <dirname> -x 2" and find out
if the problem with logging still persists.

Regards,
rohit




On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Marc Gauthier <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Rohit,
>
> I guess we've each observed output that the other has not  :-)
>
> Per your (1):  I've seen a few cases where lines between test_end and
> test_start do belong to the preceding one, though they are indeed the
> exception, not the rule.  Looking at the name to assign to previous seems
> to catch the proper ones in all the cases I've seen (default test lists
> don't repeat the same test twice in a row).
>
> Per your (2):  Haven't seen that, interesting.  That's a bit harder to sort
> out, but the script could at least catch the lines that report
> PASS/FAIL/BROK etc.  And perhaps lines that don't look like a collection of
> var=value.  Hmmm.... maybe all it needs is another regexp test, see patch
> below (against the genhtml.pl file I posted, which btw was against its
> latest version, 1.3).
>
> I haven't taken time to look at why things get out of order in the first
> place, which seems like the correct thing to fix (well, I looked enough to
> notice that fflush(stdout) was really there :-).  Though making the script
> handle it doesn't hurt, and I've simply been trying to get an accurate look
> at test results, this was the quickest way to do it.
>
> -Marc
>
> --- genhtml-v4.pl       2009-05-21 01:08:14.747493000 -0700
> +++ genhtml.pl  2009-05-22 02:07:47.756226000 -0700
> @@ -116,18 +116,18 @@
>                 }
>
>                 #  Read test result parameters and test output
> -               while ($line !~ /$end_tag/) {
> +               while (1) {
> +                       get_line(\$line) or last TEST;
> +                       last if $line =~ /$end_tag/;
>                         ($read_output = 1, next) if $line =~ /$output_tag/;
>                         ($read_output = 0, next) if $line =~
> /$execution_tag/;
> -                       if ($read_output) {
> +                       if ($read_output or $line !~
> /^(\s*\w+=(".*"|\S*))+\s*$/) {
>                             push @output_lines, $line;
>                         } else {
>                             while ($line =~ s/^\s*(\w+)=(".*"|\S*)//) {
>                                 $values{$1} = $2;
>                             }
>                         }
> -               } continue {
> -                       get_line(\$line) or last TEST;
>                 }
>
>                 #  Treat lines that follow <<<end_test>>> as output lines
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* rohit verma [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 22, 2009 00:13
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Cc:* Marc Gauthier; LTP List
> *Subject:* Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Detect test results more accurately when
> generating HTML
>
> Hi,
> The suggestion to - "Process test output lines that appear between
> <<<test_end>>>
> and the following <<<test_start>>>.  Assign to the preceding test where the
> name matches, else to the following test." does not solve the problem
> completely.
>
> My observation is:
>
> 1. Lines between <<<test_end>>> and <<<test_start>>> belongs to the
> following test case and not to the preceding one.
> 2. Also, at times I have observed the test output is spread in such a way
> that few lines of the test output fall between <<<test_end>>> and
> <<<test_start>>> and rest of lines appear between the <<<test_start>>> and
> <<<test_output>>> of the corresponding testcase.
>
> Regards,
> rohit
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Subrata Modak <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 01:13 -0700, Marc Gauthier wrote:
>> > Hi, my first patch to this list.  Actually not a patch,
>> > but the files themselves, to avoid line-wrapping issues
>> > and because the diff is twice the size of the new file.
>> >
>> > -Marc
>>
>> Thanks Marc.
>>
>> Rohit,
>>
>> Can you test this and see if these solves the problem that you were
>> discussing for long ?
>>
>> Regards--
>> Subrata
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > -----------
>> > Detect test results more accurately when generating HTML
>> >
>> > Process test output lines that appear between <<<test_end>>>
>> > and the following <<<test_start>>>.  Assign to the preceding
>> > test where the name matches, else to the following test.
>> >
>> > If a single test has multiple types of results (e.g. both
>> > FAIL and WARN), report only the most significant one, to
>> > avoid mis-computing the total number of PASS tests or
>> > total counts that don't add up to the number of tests.
>> >
>> > If a test's output has no explicit result (PASS, FAIL, etc),
>> > look at the exit value to determine whether it passed.
>> >
>> > Setting the SHOW_UNRESOLVED environment variable to 1
>> > classifies as UNRESOLVED any test with no explicit result
>> > and a zero exit code.
>> >
>> > Setting the SUMMARY_OUTPUT environment variable to 1
>> > causes only one line of output per test to be shown, for a
>> > tighter page that allows quickly scanning the results.
>> >
>> > Show percentage of each result type in summary section.
>> >
>> > Simplify parsing a bit.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by:  Marc Gauthier <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
>> > is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals.
>> Meet
>> > the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, &
>> > iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like
>> Barbarian
>> > Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com
>> > _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & 
iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com 
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to