On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 04:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 06 July 2009 03:07:56 Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > > LTP does have a large amount of testcases, and most of the testcases are > > independent from each other, thus IMHO, a single compilation failure > > should not fail the whole build process, instead, the tests that could > > not be compiled should be marked as BROKEN, and should not be executed > > during LTP execution.
Yes, that would be great. And for that an m4 rule file has to be written for each and every LTP test, checking: 1) Header dependency, 2) Library dependency, etc before compiling. Regards-- Subrata > > > > Do we have any plans to handle individual build failures in a way that > > doesn't fail the whole build process? > > use the -k option with make > -mike > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
