On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Wang Yong<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Garrett Cooper wrote as:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Wang Yong<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The error handling for "RW" opt of run_test brought about error results.
>>> This patch fixed that.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: WangYong <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> diff -Nurp a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/utimensat/utimensat_tests.sh
>>> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/utimensat/utimensat_tests.sh
>>> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/utimensat/utimensat_tests.sh
>>> 2009-07-28 16:23:39.000000000 +0800
>>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/utimensat/utimensat_tests.sh
>>> 2009-07-28 17:32:26.000000000 +0800
>>> @@ -260,22 +260,22 @@ echo "Testing read-only file, owned by s
>>> echo
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Don't these changes actually conflict with the testcase's purpose,
>> given the messages echoed placed directly above the commands?
>> Thanks,
>> -Garrett
>>
>>
>
> Hi Garrett,
>
> This patch doesn't change the testcase's purpose.
> And the test results prove it.
Wang,
You're changing everything to RW -- how is that not contradicting
the phrase `Testing read-only file'?
Just because things fail doesn't necessarily mean that the entire
intent is incorrect. Let's make sure not to lose sight of that point
:).
Thanks,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list