On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 19:21 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Henry Yei<[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, I had just noticed this as well. Since it was "passing", it took > > awhile to spot. > > > > Returning pass even with tst_resm(TFAIL,.. Being called must have something > > to do with the forking, but I'm not familiar with how the LTP framework > > deals with that. > > I don't think that's the problem. I think that the real problem is how
The part of the problem is how and when are setup() and cleanup()s are handled. > the testcase itself is written, because I don't see any code that > checks WIFEXITED and WIFSIGNALED (I would check for both those items > when doing sigqueue), and I don't see where the child(ren) actually Can you just add them up when you find time. Meanwhile i am checking in Henryś patch. Thanks. Regards-- Subrata > exit... HMMM... > > Thoughts? > -Garrett > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
