On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 17:36 +0800, CAI Qian wrote: > From: Subrata Modak <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Let set_thread_area Choose either user_desc or > modify_ldt_ldt_s > Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:52:43 +0530 > > > > > Thatś how the basic template for LTP test cases work. Include the LTP > > library specific headers only from within the Test case source code. And > > also it is logical to out only the set_thread* specific stuff in itś own > > specific header as you are doing. > > > > So, the code will not work somewhere if move the LTP library specific > headers to a common header? Those tests are using the same LTP specific > headers, so won't it simpler from the maintenance point of view to have > all headers in the same place if possible? I don't understand why "it is > logical to out only the set_thread* specific stuff in itś own specific > header". Those LTP specific headers are also required for those tests to > run.
Ok. As you wish. Done. Regards-- Subrata > > CAI Qian > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
