I tested ltp mbind case and found the result is error as follows:

mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case00) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=0 errno=0 (Success)
RESULT: return value(ret)=0 errno=0 (Success)
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case00) END => OK
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case01) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=22 (Invalid argument)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=22 (Invalid argument)
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case01) END => NG
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case02) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=22 (Invalid argument)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=22 (Invalid argument)
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case02) END => NG
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case03) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=0 errno=0 (Success)
RESULT: return value(ret)=0 errno=0 (Success)
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case03) END => OK
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case04) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=22 (Invalid argument)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=22 (Invalid argument)
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case04) END => NG
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case05) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=0 errno=0 (Success)
RESULT: return value(ret)=0 errno=0 (Success)
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case05) END => OK
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case06) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=0 errno=0 (Success), r/w check=OK
RESULT: return value(ret)=0 errno=0 (Success), r/w check=NG
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case06) END => OK
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case07) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=0 errno=0 (Success)
RESULT: return value(ret)=0 errno=0 (Success)
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case07) END => OK
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case08) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=22 (Invalid argument)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=22 (Invalid argument)
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case08) END => NG
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case09) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=22 (Invalid argument)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=22 (Invalid argument)
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case09) END => NG
mbind01     0  TINFO  :  (case10) START
mbind01     1  TFAIL  :  get_mempolicy failed - errno = 14 : Bad address
 
In case01,case02,case04,case08,case09, the expect is same with the result.
So these cases should be OK instead of NG.

In sourse code, TEST_RETURN should get value by "ret".
By the way, the "switch/case RESULT_OK" missed "break".

Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxili...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/mbind/mbind01.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mbind/mbind01.c 
b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mbind/mbind01.c
index 2b861ac..94c2dd0 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mbind/mbind01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mbind/mbind01.c
@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) {
                                int ret;
                                tst_resm(TINFO,"(case%02d) START", i);
                                ret = do_test(&tcase[i]);
+                               TEST_RETURN = ret;
                                tst_resm(TINFO,"(case%02d) END => %s", i, ( 
TEST_RETURN== 0) ? "OK" : "NG");
                                result |= ret;
                        }
@@ -399,6 +400,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) {
                        switch(result) {
                        case RESULT_OK:
                                        tst_resm(TPASS, "mbind call succeeded 
--OK-- ");
+                                       break;
 
                        default:
                                tst_resm(TFAIL, "%s failed - errno = %d : %s 
--NG--", TCID, TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to