Hi! > Thank for the reply. A couple of follow-up questions: > > If the tests are not written to the LTP standards why are they accepted > into he LTP? At least they should not be included in the default set of > tests that get run. > Is there any formal acceptance testing before a new/changed test is > accepted into the LTP? >
Well, ltp is quite old and some parts are legacy from old times, some parts are just badly written and there is no manpower to fix that in short amount of time. Instead of that we are trying to fix ltp incrementally. So when some test are constantly reporting failures they are most likely broken. One sane way how to intepret results from ltp is to compare results between kernel/system updates and watch for changes (this generates half to half chance to catch real bugs caused by changes in codebase the rest are just broken tests that needs to be fixed). -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
