On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Mitani <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I applied following Casper's patch to "ltp-2009-12-10" cvs,
> then "make" succeeded in RHEL5.4 ia64 system:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08991.html
>
> On the other hand, I used Repository's following sources,
> but "make" failed.
>  - "ptrace.h"   (Revision 1.9)
>  - "ptrace04.c" (Revision 1.13)
>
> But, at least, I think that the Repository's revision about "ptrace04.c"
> is right. And "ptrace04.c" of "ltp-2009-12-15" cvs is same one.
>
>
> Today, I arranged Casper's "ptrace.h" patch for "ltp-2009-12-15" cvs
> and applied it to this cvs, and "make" succeeded.
>
>
> I tried following other systems as using this patch, and succeeded:
>  - RHEL5.4(kernel : 2.6.18-164.el5) and x86 architecture
>  - RHEL5.4(kernel : 2.6.18-164.el5) and x86_64 architecture
>  - RHEL4.8(kernel : 2.6.9-89.ELsmp) and x86 architecture

Until this issue is resolved (I ran into problems trying to use
crossdev, so I'll have to manually inspect headers after I track down
which versions are used in the Redhat distros specified), please
remember that you _can_ always comment out the line which says:

/* Define to 1 if you have the <asm/ptrace.h> header file. */
#define HAVE_ASM_PTRACE_H 1

Actually, I think I'll just remove that header check if the build
passes unless Mike objects, because we really shouldn't be
#include'ing asm/* headers without having a good reason to do so
because it results in pain of this magnitude...

Thanks,
-Garrett

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to