On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mitani <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that "stime01" test let system-clock be faster than right time.
>
> "stime01.c" is going to set system-clock by calling "stime()" function
> with "new_time" variable.
> It gets "curr_time" by "time()" function, and sets "curr_time + 10sec"
> in "new_time".
> But after the test, It doesn't restore system-clock.
>
> Therefore, system-clock is set faster than right time about 10 seconds
> after "stime01" test.
> If this test is repeated many times, the system-clock advances for the
> number of test times.
> And, if system is rebooted, hardware-clock will be wrong.
>
> How about following patch?
The patch looks good, but I assume (and hope) that cleanup gets
executed every time before the program exits?
Thanks,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
