>>> On 2/24/2010 at 03:22 PM, in message <[email protected]>, Garrett Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Murlin Wenzel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 2/24/2010 at 02:25 PM, in message >> <[email protected]>, Garrett Cooper >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Murlin Wenzel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/24/2010 at 02:16 PM, in message >>>> <[email protected]>, Garrett >>>> Cooper >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Murlin Wenzel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> This cleans up existing swap files in swapon03 test in failing test case. >>>>> Otherwise, deleted swap files would still exist in /proc/swaps. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Murlin Ray Wenzel [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> Why not implement this as part of cleanup? >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> -Garrett >>>> >>>> I can look at doing that. I just grabbed the closest place that worked for >>> me. BTW I'm still looking at a possible kernel bug where you can't allocate >>> the maximum number of swap files. >>> >>> What kernel version are you working with? >>> -Garrett >> >> I'm testing on 2.6.32.7, but I've been told that the same problem doesn't > happen on 2.6.33 and it shouldn't happen on some as yet unknown previous > versions. > > If they changed the maximum number of swap files, then this would > be the cause for the problem as it's set to 30 since 2.6.18. See > include/swaponoff.h . > HTH, > -Garrett
The problem is MAX_SWAPFILES reports 30 but you only get 29. Murlin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
