On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:03:00AM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 21:11 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I just looked at the latest libevent, and I'm typically not one to
> > suggest this, but because libevent switched over to libtool in the 2.x
> > release (which is a pain in the ass to integrate), I think we just
> > drop the libevent testcase(s). I assume the maintainers run their
> > testcases on a subset of Unix machines, so it would just be an
> > annoying earmark that LTP has to maintain a dead // useless version of
> > libevent (eventually our version will go out of date and the code that
> > we have will bear little relevance and may be more buggy than the
> > latest version which should have appropriate tests and be executed and
> > triaged appropriately upstream).
>
> +1. Of course I am not in a position of saying something about what it
> should be done, but I totally agree that LTP should strive in keeping
> only well maintainted tests. It's harmful to keep unmantained code, it
> bitrots and tends to make everyone's life difficult.
Well said Lucas & garret. We need to really look for some outdated testcase
currently existing with LTP. I can look into it incrementally, but like garret
if someone come to know about outdated testcase with LTP or some tetssuit which
need renewal, please let us know. We will work to renew them on high priority.
Some of the testsuits i am looking are:
- cpu hot plug
- memory hotplug
-Rishi
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
