Miao,

On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 10:48 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Subrata Modak
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Earlier Subject: Re: [LTP] ext4/e4defrag.c testcases compilation error,
> >
> > Hi Garret/Miao,
> >
> > On PPC systems, fallocate() seems to be already defined at 
> > /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h,
> > so building EXT4 test cases on PPC64 machines will create build problems 
> > even if the
> > pre-requisite packages:
> >
> > e2fsprogs*
> > e2fsprogs-libs*
> > e2fsprogs-devel*
> >
> > are present. So, this patch adds an extra check. Please let me know your 
> > thoughts.
> >
> > Errors bound to occur:
> > [
> > gcc -g -O2 -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall  
> > -I/root/subrata/ltp/ltp-dev/testcases/kernel/include 
> > -I../../../../../include -I../../../../../include   -L../../../../../lib  
> > e4defrag.c   -lltp -lm -o e4defrag
> > e4defrag.c:388: error: conflicting types for ‘fallocate’
> > /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h:240: note: previous declaration of ‘fallocate’ 
> > was here
> > make[1]: *** [e4defrag] Error 1
> > ]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > --- 
> > ltp-dev/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/ext4-online-defrag/e4defrag.c 
> > 2010-03-15 19:32:12.000000000 +0530
> > +++ 
> > ltp-dev.modified/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/ext4-online-defrag/e4defrag.c
> >         2010-03-24 18:09:14.336793513 +0530
> > @@ -383,10 +383,13 @@ int sync_file_range(int fd, loff_t offse
> >  * @offset:            file offset.
> >  * @len:               file size.
> >  */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __NR_fallocate
> >  int fallocate(int fd, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >  {
> >        return syscall(__NR_fallocate, fd, mode, offset, len);
> >  }
> > +#endif
> 
>     If it's not defined, you're definitely in trouble because that
> will result in a compile error. An autoconf test should be added for
> this syscall, and/or linux_syscall_numbers.h should be integrated into
> this test. That may be a bit heavy handed because that will integrate
> some libltp pieces into the tests, but that's up to Miao to decide.

Did you get a chance to check this patch ?

Regards--
Subrata

> Thanks,
> -Garrett


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to