----- "Garrett Cooper" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 27, 2010, at 2:23 AM, Caspar ZHANG wrote: > > > <syscalls-utimensat01-run-sudo-without-tty.patch> > > What good would this do if the value's deleted and not restored? It's > better to document this IMO because then it at least brings the issue > to light as there may be other areas of the tree that require this > kind of intervention.
I didn't realize this matter, thanks for pointing it out. So what if adding the `Defaults requiretty' value back after this test finished? Thanks, Caspar > Thanks, > -Garrett -- Kernel Associate Quality Engineer Red Hat Inc. (Beijing R&D Branch) Red Hat China R&D Branch Unit 907, North Tower C, Raycom Infotech Park, No.2 Kexueyuan Nanlu, Haidian District, Beijing 100190 TEL: +86-10-62608150 Web: http://www.redhat.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
