Garret, This has not been reviewed/Acked !!
Regards-- Subrata On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 00:41 +0200, Nicolas Joly wrote: > Hi, > > The attached patch remove the TERRNO flag for the overall > clock_getres01 test status. It is wrong because, if one of the test > fails, the reported errno will always be the one from the last case05 > test (even 0 if this one was successful). > > Upon failure, the output will be: > > [...] > clock_getres01 0 TINFO : (case05) START > EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success) > RESULT: return value(ret)= 0 errno=0 (Success) > clock_getres01 6 TPASS : (case05) END > clock_getres01 7 TFAIL : clock_getres01 failed > > But previously: > > [...] > clock_getres01 0 TINFO : (case05) START > EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success) > RESULT: return value(ret)= 0 errno=0 (Success) > clock_getres01 6 TPASS : (case05) END > clock_getres01 7 TFAIL : clock_getres01 failed: errno=???(0): Success > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Joly <[email protected]> > > Regards. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first > _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
