Garret, this patch ?

Regards--
Subrata

On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 12:36 +0200, Yang, Wei wrote:
> Hi
> 
> When running shmat01 on some platforms, it fails on
> "addr = shmat(*(tc.shmid), base_addr + tc.offset,tc.flags);"
> with a INVAL error. Look at codes in "setup()", it probes
> an available address and align the address to SHMLBA. After
> alignment, the new address is no guarantee to be available
> any more. Here a bigger size is used to probe so that it's
> still valid address after alignment.Pertaining to the function
> setup_tc(lc, &tc) ,when it outside of "for (i = 0; i < TST_TOTAL;
> i++)",and printf the tc.offset value is always 0,add correct a mistake
> of original codes to move "setup_tc()" to right place.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <[email protected]>
> 
> wei yang
> BR
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
> 
> Show off your parallel programming skills.
> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
> _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to