> The problem here is that following code is just hacked together to
> reproduce some bug, creating robust testsuite is much more work. Perhaps
> asking the person who wrote the code about more details/help would be
> way to go.
I am not sure if I will get an answer there since the patch has already been 
merged for a while, but I'll try anyway. I thought the kernel coders only care 
about the fact that their code has been merged not really about the quality of 
the test code itself. :)

> Ah I see. So remove the TEST() macro and change check() to void.
OK.

> As said before, it just creates temporary directory.
OK.

> Ask the expert ;). Seriously kernel folks should help with writing
> tests, they are the only ones who trully know what to test anyway.
Well, they can't test their own code. :) -- Software testing rule #1.

> I'm not sure if it's possible to lower the value, I haven't read the
> kernel code.
No problem. Just tested it out.

CAI Qian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly 
upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move
off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build,
use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus 
Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to