On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:43:12PM +0800, Caspar Zhang wrote: > On 05/06/2011 09:41 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > > Hi! > >> diff --git a/runtest/mm b/runtest/mm > >> index f2d50d6..dded529 100644 > >> --- a/runtest/mm > >> +++ b/runtest/mm > >> @@ -78,3 +78,5 @@ oom01 oom01 > >> oom02 oom02 > >> oom03 oom03 > >> oom04 oom04 > >> + > >> +thp01 thp01 -I 600 > > > > On my machine this runs for 10 minutes (-I 1 runs for more than > > second). Is this amount of iterations really needed? > > > > The rest looks good enough. > > > > I retested the patch and found that 2 mins were enough to trigger a > crash on buggy kernel. Pingtian, any objection to set running time to > 120 instead of 600? No. It seems that 120 seconds is better. Thanks. > > Caspar
-- Han Pingtian Quality Engineer hpt @ #kernel-qe Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
