Hi! > > I'm not happy to have tarballs stored in the git for several reasons. Is > > this really needed? Shouldn't having directories with files serve the > > same purpose? > > The tarball form makes more sense since we want to select and extract > only one of the available schedules.
Hmm, but wouldn't copying directory, or even better symlinking it do the same job? > These schedule tarballs already exist in the git repository. Lucy's > patch merely moved them all into their own subdirectory to improve the > file organization. In fact, she even removed one, so now there are > only 3 instead of 4 :-) Well, that is exactly the the problem with tarballs, you can't say this for sure unless you checks by hand. -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K The only unified storage solution that offers unified management Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
