Hi! > > >> --- a/ltp-full-20101031/runtest/fs > > >> +++ b/ltp-full-20101031/runtest/fs > > >> @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ gf12 mkfifo $TMPDIR/gffifo17; growfiles -b -W gf12 -e > > >> 1 -u -i 0 -L 30 $TMPDIR/gf > > >> gf13 mkfifo $TMPDIR/gffifo18; growfiles -b -W gf13 -e 1 -u -i 0 -L 30 > > >> -I r -r 1-4096 $TMPDIR/gffifo18 > > >> gf14 growfiles -W gf14 -b -e 1 -u -i 0 -L 20 -w -l -C 1 -T 10 -f > > >> glseek19 -S 2 -d $TMPDIR > > >> gf15 growfiles -W gf15 -b -e 1 -u -r 1-49600 -I r -u -i 0 -L 120 -f > > >> Lgfile1 -d $TMPDIR > > >> -gf16 growfiles -W gf16 -b -e 1 -i 0 -L 120 -u -g 4090 -T 100 -t 408990 > > >> -l -C 10 -c 1000 -S 10 -f Lgf02_ -d $TMPDIR > > >> -gf17 growfiles -W gf17 -b -e 1 -i 0 -L 120 -u -g 5000 -T 100 -t 499990 > > >> -l -C 10 -c 1000 -S 10 -f Lgf03_ -d $TMPDIR > > >> gf18 growfiles -W gf18 -b -e 1 -i 0 -L 120 -w -u -r 10-5000 -I r -l -S > > >> 2 -f Lgf04_ -d $TMPDIR > > >> +gf16 growfiles -W gf16 -b -e 1 -i 0 -L 120 -u -g 4090 -T 101 -t 408990 > > >> -l -C 10 -c 1000 -S 10 -f Lgf02_ -d $TMPDIR > > >> +gf17 growfiles -W gf17 -b -e 1 -i 0 -L 120 -u -g 5000 -T 101 -t 499990 > > >> -l -C 10 -c 1000 -S 10 -f Lgf03_ -d $TMPDIR > > >> gf19 growfiles -W gf19 -b -e 1 -g 5000 -i 500 -t 49900 -T10 -c9 -I p -o > > >> O_RDWR,O_CREAT,O_TRUNC -u -f gf08i_ -d $TMPDIR > > >> gf20 growfiles -W gf20 -D 0 -b -i 0 -L 60 -u -B 1000b -e 1 -r > > >> 1-256000:512 -R 512-256000 -T 4 -f gfbigio-$$ -d $TMPDIR > > >> gf21 growfiles -W gf21 -D 0 -b -i 0 -L 60 -u -B 1000b -e 1 -g 20480 -T > > >> 10 -t 20480 -f gf-bld-$$ -d $TMPDIR > > > > > > Any reason why you have changed the order of the execution (the gf18 now > > > preceeds gf16 and gf17)? > > > > > Sorry, that's my mistake. > > I will resend the patch later. > > > > > Also I'm not sure if 'shrinking on the same file' wasn't intentional > > > (most likely not but I'm not sure yet). > > > > > We made the patch here for the following problem: > > gf16/gf17 create 10 files and keep them growing and shrinking. > > But shrinking on the same file leads the others to be growing only > > which may cause the tests run out of memory. > > Ah right, this should have been in the commit description and also the > amount of the memory consumed. That makes clear why you did such change > as the change itself doesn't define the problem that you hit... >
Ping, any progress on this? -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
