In sockioctl01 testcase,
Current 'inappropriate ioctl operation returning EINVAL'
With the git commit '41c31f318a5209922d051e293c61e4724daad11c' more
details at http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.commits.head/296060
'inappropriate ioctl operation returning ENOTTY'
The following patch will fix this.
sockioctl01:
Before patch:
...
sockioctl01 4 TFAIL : ATMARK on UDP ; returned -1 (expected -1),
errno 25 (expected 22)
...
After patch:
...
sockioctl01 4 TPASS : ATMARK on UDP successful
...
P.S. patch has ran through checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by: Nageswara R Sastry <[email protected]>
--
Regards
R.Nageswara Sastry
--- ltp.orig/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sockioctl/sockioctl01.c 2011-09-08
11:32:12.000000000 +0200
+++ ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sockioctl/sockioctl01.c 2011-09-12
13:27:24.000000000 +0200
@@ -227,6 +227,11 @@ void setup1(void)
strerror(errno));
}
sinlen = sizeof(fsin1);
+
+ if (strncmp(tdat[testno].desc, "ATMARK on UDP", 14) == 0) {
+ if ((tst_kvercmp(2, 6, 39)) >= 0)
+ tdat[testno].experrno = ENOTTY;
+ }
}
void setup2(void)
@@ -254,4 +259,4 @@ void cleanup1(void)
{
(void)close(s);
s = -1;
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
