On Tuesday 03 January 2012 08:21:48 Markos Chandras wrote: > Hi, please review the attached patch
two of these hunks are fallout of your tst_brkm() no attribute change. those don't actually return, so there shouldn't be a need to add explicit returns. the 3rd hunk (adding a return after tst_exit) is wrong -- that is marked noreturn and isn't changing. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
