On Monday 09 January 2012 06:08:48 Markos Chandras wrote: > Right now the use of UCLINUX implies the use of __UCLIBC__ as well. Even > though this is true from UCLINUX's perspective, it is not valid from the > uclibc's one. A non-uclinux system can perfectly work with uclibc. What > I suggest is to keep the UCLINUX option as is, but also add a new option > called UCLIBC which will enable us to avoid all the restrictions imposed > by the use of UCLINUX macro (especially the disabled tests in > testcases/kernel/systecall/Makefile).
header/func tests should get moved to configure. we should not introduce or rely on any new ifdefs like UCLIBC or __UCLIBC__. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
