On Thursday 14 June 2012 06:13 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> It looks like the github repo accidentally got lighweight tag instead of >> the anotated one, at least git describe didn't work as expected. The >> sf.net repo looked okay. >> >> I've fixed the tags on github repo, but still I'm a bit confused... >> >> What was the exact procedure you used to upload tags? >> >> Ah, and I've looked into my sync script and it doesn't seem to mirror >> tags from github to sf.net. I could fix my script so the tags on github >> automatically appears on sf.net too. >> >> And one more question, what is the difference between ltp-20120614 and >> ltp-full-20120614 tarball on sf.net. It's a bit confusing, at least for >> me. Sorry for confusion. I created "ltp-full-20120614" first but later created one more directory ltp-20120614 (to match with the current directory naming conventions) and did release with this second tarball. I should have removed "ltp-full-20120614" after release to avoid confusion to others. I have removed it and only ltp-20120614 persists now...
> And I've force synced the tags from github to sf.net so the two repos > are in sync now. > > I will add tag syncing to the script later today. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
