----- Original Message ----- > From: "Zhouping Liu" <z...@redhat.com> > To: "Caspar Zhang" <cas...@casparzhang.com> > Cc: "LTP List" <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net> > Sent: Friday, 10 August, 2012 10:02:01 AM > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH resend 5/6] mm: use new numa_helper >
> > -» return·nnodes; > > +» ret·=·get_allowed_nodes(NH_MEMS|NH_CPUS,·1,·&nd1); > > Caspar, I found get_a_numa_node always return the first node id, > which > will make all cases called the function > only run in the first node, I don't think it's a good way, it > decrease > the coverage. We had a discussion with Caspar on this topic: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16495 Can you explain why a specific node matters here? Regards, Jan > > we should prefer to run cases on the second node, we can chose the > first > only if it just only has > one node with NH_MEMS|NH_CPUS. do you think so? > > and others is good for me. > > Thanks, > Zhouping ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
