On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:05 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi!
>> While looking trough the results especially searching for some
>> pattern, I noticed the different spelling of the word "succeeded" VS.
>> "succeded".
>> The spell-checker integrated in Firefox v18.0 tells me "succeeded"
>> with double-e is correct.
>>
>> [ SUCCEDED - one "E" ]
>>
>> $ egrep -i 'error|fail'
>> runltplite-results_3.8.0-rc3-next20130116-2-iniza-generic.txt | egrep
>> -i succeded
>> flock01     1  TPASS  :  flock() succeded with Shared Lock, returned
>> error number=0
>> flock01     2  TPASS  :  flock() succeded with Unlock, returned error 
>> number=0
>> flock01     3  TPASS  :  flock() succeded with Exclusive Lock,
>> returned error number=0
>>
>> [ SUCCEEDED - double "E" ]
>>
>> $ egrep -i 'error|fail'
>> runltplite-results_3.8.0-rc3-next20130116-2-iniza-generic.txt | egrep
>> -i succeeded
>> madvise02    5  TFAIL  :  madvise succeeded unexpectedly
>> open call succeededopen failed with EACCES as expectedopen call
>> succeeded<<<execution_status>>>
>>
>> AFAICS flock01.c needs to be corrected:
>>
>> --- ltp-full-20120903.orig/testcases/kernel/syscalls/flock/flock01.c
>>  2012-09-03 06:39:27.000000000 +0200
>> +++ ltp-full-20120903/testcases/kernel/syscalls/flock/flock01.c
>> 2013-01-16 14:12:36.597859952 +0100
>> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>                                 continue;       /*next loop for MTKERNEL  */
>>                         } else {
>>                                 tst_resm(TPASS,
>> -                                        "flock() succeded with %s,
>> returned error number=%d",
>> +                                        "flock() succeeded with %s,
>> returned error number=%d",
>>                                          test_cases[i].opt, TEST_ERRNO);
>>                         }
>>
>> Not sure if you like that patch sent via git-email as a separate patch?
>
> There is no need for such elaborate explanation for a patch fixing a typo ;).
>
> The ideal way of sending a patches here is unified diff with
> signed-of-by line (you can generate these by git format-patch or use git
> send-email to mail them directly).
>

Yupp, I registered ltp-commits ML and sent a patch via git send-email.

- Sedat -

> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> [email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery
and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts.
SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612 
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to