Hi!
> > > +static void test_seek(void)
> > > +{
> > > + int k, j = NUM_READ_RETRY, fd;
> > > + char msg[MAX_MSGSIZE];
> > > + unsigned long seqno[2];
> > > +
> > > + /* 1. read() after SEEK_SET 0 returns same (first) message */
> > > + tst_resm(TINFO, "TEST: seek SEEK_SET 0");
> > > +
> > > + fd = open("/dev/kmsg", O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
> > > + if (fd < 0)
> > > +         tst_brkm(TBROK|TERRNO, cleanup, "failed to open /dev/kmsg");
> > > +
> > > + while (j) {
> > > +         for (k = 0; k < 2; k++) {
> > > +                 TEST(read(fd, msg, sizeof(msg)));
> > > +                 if (TEST_RETURN == -1) {
> > > +                         if (errno == EPIPE)
> > > +                                 break;
> > > +                         else
> > > +                                 tst_brkm(TBROK|TTERRNO, cleanup,
> > > +                                         "failed to read /dev/kmsg");
> > > +                 }
> > > +                 if (get_msg_fields(msg, NULL, &seqno[k]) != 0)
> > > +                         tst_resm(TFAIL, "failed to parse seqid: %s",
> > > +                                 msg);
> > > +                 if (k == 0)
> > > +                         if (lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET) == -1)
> > > +                                 tst_resm(TFAIL|TERRNO,
> > > +                                         "SEEK_SET 0 failed");
> > > +         }
> > > +
> > > +         if (TEST_RETURN != -1)
> > > +                 break;
> > > +
> > > +         /* give a second to whoever overwrote first message to finish */
> > > +         sleep(1);
> > > +         j--;
> > > +
> > > +         /* read returned EPIPE, reopen fd and try again */
> > > +         SAFE_CLOSE(cleanup, fd);
> > > +         fd = open("/dev/kmsg", O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
> > > +         if (fd < 0)
> > > +                 tst_brkm(TBROK|TERRNO, cleanup,
> > > +                         "failed to open /dev/kmsg");
> > 
> > I guess that the comment says something different than the code, there
> > is no read involved here.
> 
> Read mentioned here is the one at the beginning of for loop. This line can 
> only
> be reached if that read returned EPIPE. Other failures will end with TBROK.
> If read succeeded this line is never reached, "if (TEST_RETURN != -1)" above
> will break the while loop.

Ah it could be read as imperative sentence too, which confused me
slightly.

I guess that "read has returned EPIPE" would be clearer...

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to