----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wanlong Gao" <[email protected]>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "LTP" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, 26 July, 2013 9:52:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pthread_rwlock_rdlock:2-1: do not test on glibc
> 
> On 07/26/2013 03:07 PM, Jan Stancek wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Wanlong Gao" <[email protected]>
> >> To: "LTP" <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: "Cyril Hrubis" <[email protected]>, "Caspar Zhang"
> >> <[email protected]>, "Garrett Cooper" <[email protected]>,
> >> "Mike Frysinger" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Wanlong Gao"
> >> <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Friday, 26 July, 2013 4:56:18 AM
> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] pthread_rwlock_rdlock:2-1: do not test on glibc
> >>
> >> Since the reader can always acquire the rwlock if there's not a writer
> >> held the lock.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I agree that these 3 fail by default on glibc at the moment.
> > Since we are adding a GLIBC ifdef, I'm wondering if we could use
> > glibc specific api to change default behaviour with
> > pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np() and still run the testcase.
> 
> The first 2 *_rdlock cases can change to WRITER_PREFER to let them pass,
> but the last *_unlock one can't, because *_unlock will choose the writer
> first without any care of the NP KIND.
> How about change the first two cases to WRITER_PREFER and just skip the third
> *_unlock one?

I agree with skipping third one and let's see what other guys think about first 
two.
When you say "WRITER_PREFER", is that an actual define on your system? Or just
a shortcut for PTHREAD_RWLOCK_PREFER_WRITER...?

Regards,
Jan

> 
> Thanks,
> Wanlong Gao
> 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Jan
> > 
> >> ---
> >>  .../conformance/interfaces/pthread_rwlock_rdlock/2-1.c              | 6
> >>  ++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git
> >> a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_rwlock_rdlock/2-1.c
> >> b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_rwlock_rdlock/2-1.c
> >> index c6c1412..62a4b3b 100644
> >> ---
> >> a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_rwlock_rdlock/2-1.c
> >> +++
> >> b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_rwlock_rdlock/2-1.c
> >> @@ -141,6 +141,12 @@ int main(void)
> >>    return PTS_UNSUPPORTED;
> >>  #endif
> >>  
> >> +#ifdef __GLIBC__
> >> +  printf("The reader can always acquire rwlock if there's"
> >> +          " not a writer held this lock in glibc\n");
> >> +  return PTS_UNTESTED;
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >>    int cnt = 0;
> >>    pthread_t rd_thread, wr_thread;
> >>    int priority;
> >> --
> >> 1.8.3.3.754.g9c3c367
> >>
> >>
> > 
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to