Hi! > I've not verified this patch with UCLINUX defined. Yet. > > Just want to be sure that the general idea is acceptable.
The idea is fine, but the original test is so messed up I would be tempted to rewrite it from scratch... If you decide to fix it (which is also a good idea ;), please clean it up first (in separate patch). Moreovere the code for msgctl09 is nearly the same. What about moving the commont parts into a header in the cleanup process? -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
