Hi! > > Also looking at the access testcases, there is allready access05 to test > > access failures, I wonder if it would be better to move the ENOTDIR and > > ELOOP tests there (after it's cleaned up a bit). But I'm not sure about > > this myself... > > Since access03 and access05 both contain error number tests for access, > I think a new access06 would be better to make the three error number > tests clearer. > If you perfer to add these test to existing tests, I will make a new version > patch.
Actually after looking at your v2 patch the code is cleaner than the access05.c, what about moving the testcases from access05 to the test you written and calling the result access05? Are you OK with that? -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
