On Wednesday 08 January 2014 10:22:59 [email protected] wrote:
> > > Since glibc-2.18, the struct ptrace_peeksiginfo_args is
> > > also defined in sys/ptrace.h and conflicts with the definition
> > > from the Linux kernel in linux/ptrace.h. We fix this by not
> > > including the linux/ptrace.h header if the sys/ptrace.h header
> > > defines the said struct. Fixes
> > > https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/6
> > 
> > i'm somewhat inclined to undo this as it's really a bug in glibc-2.18
> > that
> > 
> > should be fixed in glibc-2.19:
> >     https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-01/msg00078.html
> 
> Let's keep it for the next release (which will happen anytime soon). The
> ptrace tests are messy and the ptrace.h needs to be fixed anyway.
> 
> Or do you insist on removing it before the release? I don't like that
> idea much but I can change my opinion if you provide reasonable
> arguments.

we can leave it for a while, but i'll delete it once glibc-2.19 is out for 
some time
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to