Hi! > > This is hardly pefromance critical code so we don't need fine grade > > locking as this. What we can do in most of the cases is to take the > > mutext and call the function from tst_res.c, which would lead to much > > simpler code. > > glibc provides pthread mutex lock/unlock stubs, so i wonder if we even need > _r > variants. if the program hasn't linked against -lpthread, then the funcs > will > simply return. if it has, then you get locking.
That sounds interesting. Do you know if this is implemented in uClibc (and possibly in other alternative libc libraries) too? -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android apps run on BlackBerry 10 Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps. Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more. Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience. Start now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
