On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 02:33:42PM +0800, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 07/04/2014 11:16 AM, Han Pingtian wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Please review this patch. Thanks.
> > 
> > There is a bug on 64bit sendfile() with large file, please see
> > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2014-June/118128.html
> > for details.
> 
> I'd like to ask an irrelevant question about that where can we get such bug 
> report or similar issues
> about syscalls from a stable place(url), or how did you found this issue, 
> thanks.
> 
> Give that currently there are 1039 test cases about syscalls in LTP(cat 
> runtest/syscalls | grep -v "^#" | sed -e '/^$/d' | wc -l),
> we can tell that syscalls is a very big test suite in LTP, so I'd like to add 
> all similar regression test about
> syscalls to LTP, which will expand ltp's test coverage, thanks. 
> 
> Regards,
> Xiaoguang Wang
> 
Thanks for your reply. I knew this problem just by accidental. It wasn't
found by me, but someone else. We are asked why we couldn't find it at
first time though we had run ltp to test the syscalls. So I think it
would be better to include a regession test for it to ltp. I think we
can find out all those regressions by mointoring bug report web site and
kernel's mailing list and something like these.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to