Hi! > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sbrk/sbrk02.c > b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sbrk/sbrk02.c > index caa8537..5e9d4b8 100644 > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sbrk/sbrk02.c > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sbrk/sbrk02.c > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static void sbrk_verify(void); > static void cleanup(void); > static int exp_enos[] = { ENOMEM, 0 }; > > -static long increment; > +static long increment = INC; > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > { > @@ -60,12 +60,19 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > > static void setup(void) > { > + void *ret = NULL; > + > tst_sig(NOFORK, DEF_HANDLER, cleanup); > > TEST_PAUSE; > > - for (increment = INC; errno == 0; increment+=INC) > - sbrk(increment); > + /* call sbrk until it fails or increment overflows */ > + while (ret != (void *)-1 && increment > 0) { > + ret = sbrk(increment); > + increment += INC; > + } > + tst_resm(TINFO | TERRNO, "setup() bailing inc: %ld, ret: %p, sbrk: %p", > + increment, ret, sbrk(0)); > > errno = 0;
Ok, this fixes the inifinite loop, but doesn't the testcase still fail afterwards? The sbrk_verify() expects it to fail with ENOMEM and when the setup fails to prepare the condition it may not fail, or am I mistaken? -- Cyril Hrubis chru...@suse.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list