Hi.

Could anybody look at the series?

If there are no objections, I'm going to push it tomorrow.

Thanks.

On 08/25/2014 12:26 PM, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote:
>
>
> On 08/22/2014 11:05 AM, Xiong Zhou wrote:
>>
>> According to nfs(5), NLM supports advisory file locks only. So skip
>> fcntl16 test block2 and block3 if NFS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhou <xz...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>
> The entire series looks good for me.
>
> Just found removed spaces below, but there is no need to resend the
> patch/series because it can be fixed at commit time. :)
>
> Thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmansk...@oracle.com>
>
>
>>    testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>>    1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c 
>> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c
>> index 44b6a80..67d3b17 100644
>> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c
>> @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@
>>    #include <sys/types.h>
>>    #include <sys/wait.h>
>>
>> +#include "tst_fs_type.h"
>> +
>>    #define SKIPVAL 0x0f00
>>    //#define       SKIP    SKIPVAL, 0, 0L, 0L, IGNORED
>>    #define SKIP 0,0,0L,0L,0
>> @@ -62,6 +64,7 @@
>>    #define   NOBLOCK         2       /* immediate success */
>>    #define   WILLBLOCK       3       /* blocks, succeeds, parent unlocks 
>> records */
>>    #define   TIME_OUT        10
>> +int NO_NFS = 1;                     /* Test on NFS or not */
>>
>>    typedef struct {
>>      struct flock parent_a;
>> @@ -412,6 +415,10 @@ void setup(void)
>>
>>      tst_tmpdir();
>>
>> +    /* On NFS or not */
>> +    if (tst_fs_type(cleanup, ".") == TST_NFS_MAGIC)
>> +            NO_NFS = 0;
>> +
>>      /* set up temp filename */
>>      sprintf(tmpname, "fcntl4.%d", parent);
>>
>> @@ -689,13 +696,17 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>>               * locking
>>               */
>>              tst_resm(TINFO, "Entering block 2");
>> -            if (run_test(O_CREAT | O_RDWR | O_TRUNC, S_ISGID |
>> +            if (NO_NFS && run_test(O_CREAT | O_RDWR | O_TRUNC, S_ISGID |
>>                           S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, 0, 11)) {
>>                      tst_resm(TINFO, "Test case 2: with mandatory record "
>>                               "locking FAILED");
>>              } else {
>> -                    tst_resm(TINFO, "Test case 2: with mandatory record "
>> -                             "locking PASSED");
>> +                    if (NO_NFS)
>> +                            tst_resm(TINFO, "Test case 2: with mandatory"
>> +                                     "record locking PASSED");
> We need a space here
>
>> +                    else
>> +                            tst_resm(TCONF, "Test case 2: NFS does not"
>> +                                     " support mandatory locking");
>>              }
>>              tst_resm(TINFO, "Exiting block 2");
>>
>> @@ -705,13 +716,17 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>>               * and no delay
>>               */
>>              tst_resm(TINFO, "Entering block 3");
>> -            if (run_test(O_CREAT | O_RDWR | O_TRUNC | O_NDELAY,
>> +            if (NO_NFS && run_test(O_CREAT | O_RDWR | O_TRUNC | O_NDELAY,
>>                           S_ISGID | S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, 0, 11)) {
>>                      tst_resm(TINFO, "Test case 3: mandatory locking with "
>>                               "NODELAY FAILED");
>>              } else {
>> -                    tst_resm(TINFO, "Test case 3: mandatory locking with "
>> -                             "NODELAY PASSED");
>> +                    if (NO_NFS)
>> +                            tst_resm(TINFO, "Test case 3: mandatory"
>> +                                     "locking with NODELAY PASSED");
> and here
>> +                    else
>> +                            tst_resm(TCONF, "Test case 3: NFS does not"
>> +                                     " support mandatory locking");
>>              }
>>              tst_resm(TINFO, "Exiting block 3");
>>      }
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to