Hello,
The ldd01 always failed on some powerpc systems of ours. I have figured
out a patch. Please take a look. Thanks in advance.
On some powerpc system, the 'uname -a' doesn't show 'powerpc' but will
show 'ppc'. So we need using it to check the powerpc arch.
Signed-off-by: Han Pingtian <ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
testcases/commands/ade/ldd/ldd01 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/testcases/commands/ade/ldd/ldd01 b/testcases/commands/ade/ldd/ldd01
index c60d3ac..569902e 100755
--- a/testcases/commands/ade/ldd/ldd01
+++ b/testcases/commands/ade/ldd/ldd01
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ do_setup()
mkdir $TCtmp
# Check for ppc64 architecture or x86_64 architecture
- if uname -a | grep -iq powerpc; then
+ if uname -a | grep -iq 'ppc\|powerpc'; then
file lddfile1.obj | grep 64-bit >/dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
CFLAGS="-m64"
--
1.9.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
