----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jan Stancek" <jstan...@redhat.com> > To: "Xiong Zhou" <xz...@redhat.com> > Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:54:07 PM > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 0/3] fix old commit about skipping tests on NFS > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Xiong Zhou" <xz...@redhat.com> > > To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > > Sent: Thursday, 11 September, 2014 9:34:46 AM > > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 0/3] fix old commit about skipping tests on NFS > > > > Ping :) > > Hi, > > I see this is a reply, but I can't find any other message from this thread > in my inbox or in web archives: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/21550 > > Can you re-send the series?
OK, I will resend this. Thanks, xzhou > > Regards, > Jan > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Xiong Zhou" <xz...@redhat.com> > > > To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > > > Cc: "stanislav kholmanskikh" <stanislav.kholmansk...@oracle.com>, > > > xz...@redhat.com > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 6:13:09 PM > > > Subject: [PATCH 0/3] fix old commit about skipping tests on NFS > > > > > > Fix old commit 5387ba03ce8eaddc7ec330ed03e579eed92596cc > > > Skip only one block in fcntl14 instead of the whole case. > > > splice/tee/utime pass on NFS now, so update the obsolete > > > info. > > > > > > > > > Xiong Zhou (3): > > > fcntl14: dup code clean up > > > fcntl14: skip test block2 on NFS > > > splice01/tee01/utime: test back on NFS > > > > > > testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl14.c | 85 > > > +++++++++++++---------------- > > > testcases/kernel/syscalls/splice/splice01.c | 5 -- > > > testcases/kernel/syscalls/tee/tee01.c | 5 -- > > > testcases/kernel/syscalls/utime/utime01.c | 1 - > > > testcases/kernel/syscalls/utime/utime02.c | 1 - > > > testcases/kernel/syscalls/utime/utime03.c | 1 - > > > 6 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 1.8.3.1 > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Want excitement? > > Manually upgrade your production database. > > When you want reliability, choose Perforce > > Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > _______________________________________________ > > Ltp-list mailing list > > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
