Hi! > > > My attempt with building out-of-tree with your suggested work-around > > > failed as well, now the ffsb complains about the "all" target... > > > > Strange, it worked for me after doing out of tree configure and then > > configure in the ffsb directory... > > Maybe I didn't build a clean build as I thought, or did things the > wrong way... Regardless, in-tree build works at least.
I've just pushed a fix that should work for all. Please test it. There seems to be some build problems for out-of-tree build but only if you have tirpc devel installed (which triggers build for the network/rpc/rpc-tirpc testcases). > I guess you're right. The Linux kernel is probably one of the last > bastions where in-tree builds actually works better than out-of-tree > builds, which probably translate into an expectation that LTP works > best with in-tree builds. It's just such a pain with all those derived > files mixed with versioned ones, which I guess is why you want > out-of-tree builds to work as well. It has other uses too, you can build it for different configurations from one source tree, etc. But given the fact that this setup is less tested it tends to break occasionally :( -- Cyril Hrubis chru...@suse.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
