On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:53:36PM +0100, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > We have a system which only has one NUMA node. When trying to run ksm02
> > on it, becase the code calling get_allowed_nodes() with a count 2 as
> > below:
> > 
> >  972 /* Warning: *DO NOT* use this function in child */
> >  973 unsigned int get_a_numa_node(void (*cleanup_fn) (void))
> >  974 {              
> >  975         unsigned int nd1, nd2;
> >  976         int ret; 
> >  977                        
> >  978         ret = get_allowed_nodes(0, 2, &nd1, &nd2);
> >  979         switch (ret) { 
> >  980         case 0:
> >  981                 break;
> >  982         case -3:
> >  983                 tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup_fn, "requires a NUMA system.");
> > 
> > it always failed with "requires a NUMA system.".
> > 
> > I think a NUMA system may have only one node, right? If so, could we
> > change the count to 1?
> 
> Hmm, are you sure that the testcases are actually applicable to a system
> with only one node?
> 
> Because what the testcases do in the setup is to write 1 to
> /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/merge_across_nodes so I would expect that the test
> needs at least two nodes...
> 
I think if there is only one NUMA node, then this is a special case for
this testcase, it'll test if set "merge_across_nodes" to 1, any problem
will be triggered.

I have tried to change the node count to 1 in get_allowed_nodes() and
recompiled ksm02. It works successfully.

Thanks.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to