Hi!
> There is one more issue with tbio. :(
> 
> Sometimes it may fail with:
> 
> ltp_tbio    0  TINFO  :  Device opened successfully
> ltp_tbio    1  TPASS  :  success on LTP_TBIO_ALLOC test
> ltp_tbio    2  TPASS  :  success on LTP_TBIO_CLONE test
> ltp_tbio    3  TPASS  :  success on LTP_TBIO_GET_NR_VECS test
> ltp_tbio    4  TPASS  :  success on LTP_TBIO_ADD_PAGE test
> ltp_tbio    5  TPASS  :  success on LTP_TBIO_SPLIT:write to dev
> ltp_tbio    6  TPASS  :  success on LTP_TBIO_DO_IO:write to dev
> ltp_tbio    7  TPASS  :  success on LTP_TBIO_DO_IO:read from dev
> ltp_tbio    8  TPASS  :  success on LTP_TBIO_PUT test
> ERROR: Module ltp_tbio is in use
> ltp_tbio    9  TBROK  :  tst_run_cmd.c:84: failed to exec cmd 'rmmod' at 
> tst_run_cmd.c:84
> ltp_tbio   10  TBROK  :  tst_run_cmd.c:84: Remaining cases broken

Hmm, would switch to modprobe -r fix that?

I've been told several times that rrmod should not be used anymore
because modprobe handles things better...

Or will modprobe -r fail the same way?

> This is a rfc patch which fixes this problem.
> 
> The main idea is to execute rmmod up to a timeout, and check if the module
> has been unloaded after each execution of rmmod.
>
> Summary of changes:
>  * introduce tst_module_is_loaded() - checks if the module is in /proc/modules
>  * change a bit interfaces of tst_run_cmd and cmd_run_cmd_fds (to 
> conditionally
>    check the program exit code to be able to continue the test if the program 
> failed)
>  * introducing a loop into tst_module_unload
>

That sounds reasonably.

> I would like somebody to review the general idea. If it's ok, I'll split this 
> patch
> into several logically coupled ones and resend them.
> 
> I'm really unsure if the changes to tst_run_cmd and cmd_run_cmd_fds are 
> acceptable.

I'm OK with adding the flag, it would need a better name though.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chru...@suse.cz

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to