On 05/12/2015 12:25 AM, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Hi! >> * No need to allocate memory for getpwnam()'s return, >> So remove these codes. >> >> * replace getpwnam() with getpwnam_r() that is thread-safe. > > Hmm, is this code actually called from a testcase that runs in several > threads? Otherwise it looks like overly complicated solution for problem > that does not exist.
Yeah, this is what I considered before, so I'm not sure and like to ask your points. Thanks, Wanlong Gao > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
