Hi! > I read your January 2015 article where someone asked if TAP test output would > be supported. It sounded like > you were going to look into it. Did you make any progress?
Unfortunately not yet. > The reason I asked if because I was wanting the same feature and I was going > to review the LTP code to see > how hard it would be to add it, but I wouldn't want to start if someone else > has already done it. I did > see anything in the git history tho. Well, have a look at lib/tst_res.c, that is the place where test results are stored/printed. Unfortunately this code hasn't been cleaned up yet. I've started to work on this just recently. Just now I'm experimenting with rewriting it from scratch keeping most of the API unchanged (since we cannot change easily the API for > ~1000 testcases). Then there is another problem, so far LTP testcases are executed using the ltp-pan test driver, which executes testcases, catches segfaults, etc. We would have to consider how that would interact with the output generated from testcases. One option would be to get rid of most of the pan functionality by moving the test driver code into the test library, so that each testcase would fork first, then run the real test in it's own virtual terminal, etc. -- Cyril Hrubis chru...@suse.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
