On 10/08/2010 05:22 AM, Petr Machata wrote: > 08.10.2010 04:03, Zach Welch wrote: ... >> Assuming that you're testing on x86, these are all fixed by two patches >> in Arnaud's series (demangle-lib.cpp and count-records.exp). I suggest >> reordering his series to ensure those patches go in first. > > Hi, > > as soon as that's done, I'll try to run the suite on Fedora (where I > maintain ltrace). There's a bunch of patches in Fedora, on top of some > old stable-ish svn checkout. I'll see into cleaning up and moving into > git anything that makes sense (or is necessary for ltrace to pass the > suite).
Thanks for confirming my hypothesis regarding distributions hoarding patches when the upstream appears to have gone dry. I encourage you to forward all of the patches that you have been maintaining for Fedora. If you want to help avoid duplication, you can pull Joe's Git repository and see all of the patches that may be pending. -- Zach Welch CodeSourcery [email protected] (650) 331-3385 x743 _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
