On 10/08/2010 11:47 AM, Zachary T Welch wrote: > Presently, ltrace does not work all of the time on the ARM platform when > generating Thumb-2 or interworked ARM/Thumb code. This series of patches > fixes the remaining problems, once all of the other pending patches have > been applied to the tree.
To clarify, there are three patches in this series; all of the original subject lines ended up being hopelessly misleading. Patch 1 of 4 was submitted last week as a fix for the ARM syscall_p function. After posting, I noticed that my PLT patch needs updating to trim the superfluous "#include <sys/ptrace.h>". I thought that it would be possible to peek at the live PLT. Instead, I discovered that this function gets called before the target process has been created, so I was forced to examine the ELF section. I have also made a minor stylistic change. I will send the revised patch shortly, though I have yet to see my original posts appear in my mailbox.... The posts do appear in the archives, and this is not the first time that I have not received some of my own posts. Does anyone else have problems receiving list traffic from alioth, or is it just me? Let me know if y'all see other problems with these changes. I would also like to hear of testing results on other ARM systems. -- Zach Welch CodeSourcery [email protected] (650) 331-3385 x743 _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
