07.12.2010 14:07, Petr Machata wrote:
Unless I'm mistaken, those above are not really regressions. They are
new tests for things that never worked. If the goal is to put out a
release that passes its own test suite, then all that's needed is to
comment out the right lines in parameters.exp. But I'd rather keep the
code itself in tree.
FWIW, I'm _for_ putting out a release that can pass its own testsuite.
can be deferred until a later release, but I would be happier to see
these fixed properly.
FWIW, the fixes for passing double on 32-bit machines is here:
https://github.com/pmachata/ltrace/tree/pmachata
This branch may need re-seating after recent changes to tree history.
That should take care of the first failure that you cited.
Except it probably won't. You'd probably need to implement
get_argument_rich for arm.
PM
_______________________________________________
Ltrace-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
